Criteria Pts
Question 1a 3 Pts
Strategic plan
must be well
developed and
must include 1
vision, 2 specific
goals, 4 specific
objectives and 2
specific strategies
(i.e. 9
components).
2 Pts
Strategic plan is
well developed but
one or two
missing elements
or not specific
enough.
1 Pt
Strategic plan
is presented
but does not
adequately
address the
issues or has
less than 7
components
present.
0.5 Pts
Strategic plan is
too generic or
poorly
developed.
0 Pt
No strategic
plan
presented.
Question 2a 3 Pts
Pros and Cons
have been
properly
discussed, the
recommendation
is appropriate,
and the
justifications and
assumptions are
well established.
2 Pts
Pros and Cons or
appropriate
recommendation
with justification
has been
presented.
1 Pt
The pros and
cons provided
has some
issues even
and the
justification
and
assumptions
are not clearly
stated.
0.5 Pt
The pros and
cons provided is
poorly presented,
and the
justification
provided is
inadequate.
0 Pt
Inappropriate
recommendati
on without
discussion of
pros and
cons.
Question 2b 1 Pt
At least 2 clear
examples have
been provided.
0.5 Pts
Only 1 example
has been provided.
0 Pt
No example
has been
provided.
Question 3a 2 Pts
All the required
elements – job
title, description,
skills, experience,
qualifications
present
1.5 Pts
Missing one
element
OR
somewhat generic
content
1 Pt
Missing
multiple
elements
OR
generic
content
0.5
Missing several
elements
OR
very generic
content
0 Pt
No job
description
provided
OR
irrelevant to
the scenario
Question 3b 1 Pt
Specific pros and
cons relevant to
the scenario
discussed
0.5 Pts
General pros and
cons discussed but
without applying
to the scenario
0 Pt
Missing or
irrelevant
pros and cons
Question 3c 2 Pts
At least two
specific
challenges with
specific and
relevant
mitigation
strategies
identified
1.5 Pts
At least one
specific challenge
with specific and
relevant mitigation
strategy identified
OR two
challenges and
strategies that are
somewhat generic
1 Pt
At least one
challenge
identified but
clear and
specific
mitigation
strategies not
identified
0.5 Pts
Generic content
that starts to
identify some
challenges, but
are not specific
to the scenario
0 Pt
Missing OR
irrelevant
content
Question 4a 1 Pt
Merits and
demerits of the
correct leadership
approach -Proper
0.75 Pts
One of two
components is
correct and the
other has some
0.5 Pts
Only one
component is
correct, and
justification is
0 Pt
No merits or
demerits has
been presented

 

discussion of the
trade-off.
errors. Some
justification has
been provided.
not well
established.
and justification
is missing.
Question 4b 1Pt
Appropriate
motivation and
HR strategies
have been
analysed and
applied to the
scenario.
0.5 Pts
The motivation or
HR strategy
presented is not
appropriate given
the scenario.
0 Pt
Both
motivation
and HR
strategies are
missing or
inappropriate
.
Question 4c 1 Pt
Proper ethical
issue has been
provided and the
justification is
well established
given the
scenario.
0.5 Pts
The ethical issue
provided is
appropriate,
however the
justification is not
well established to
the given scenario.
0 Pt
No Proper
ethical issue,
nor
justification
has been
provided.
Question 4d 1 Pt
The IP protection
strategy provided
is appropriate and
supported with
suitable
justification
.
0.5 Pts
The IP protection
strategy provided
is appropriate, but
the justification is
not well
established.
0 Pt
No suitable
IP protection
and
justification
has been
provided.
Question 5a 2 Pts
Correct answers
have been
provided,
supported with
appropriate
working.
1.5 Pts
Answer is correct
but suitable
working is
missing.
1 Pt
Answer is
incorrect but
some working
has been
provided.
0 Pts
Answer is
incorrect, and no
working is
shown or
presented.
Question 5b 2 Pts
Critically analyses
and evaluates the
performance
figures with
sufficient rigour
to identify trends;
provides suitable
recommendation
/suggestion with
sufficient
justification.
1.5 Pts
Provides a good
analysis of the
figures, can
identify trends and
provides
recommendations
with good
justification.
1 Pt
Some analysis
of the figures
has been
presented
however
suggestions/r
ecommendati
on is not well
grounded and
some
justification
has been
provided.
0.5 Pts
The analysis
provided is
poorly presented,
there are issues
with the
recommendation
/suggestions and
justification is
inadequate.
0 Pt
No analysis
has been
presented,
suggestions/r
ecommendati
on is missing,
and
justification is
grossly
lacking.
Question 6a 2 Pts
Two specific
creativity
techniques
applied to the
product
1.5 Pt
Two creativity
techniques applied
but may not be
specific to the
product
1 Pt
One specific
creativity
technique
applied to the
product
0.5 Pts
One creativity
technique
applied to the
product but may
not be specific to
the product
0 Pts
Missing OR
irrelevant to
the question

 

Question 6b 3 Pts
Complete SWOT
analysis with clear
explanation on
capitalising on
strengths and
opportunities and
mitigating
weaknesses and
threats
2 Pts
Complete SWOT
analysis, but may
be missing clear
explanation on
capitalising on
strengths and
opportunities and
mitigating
weaknesses and
threats
1.5 Pts
Similar to 2
pts, but
content may
be somewhat
generic and
not specific to
the scenario
1 Pt
Incomplete
SWOT analysis
AND/OR
missing
explanation on
either capitalising
on strengths and
opportunities
and/or
mitigating
weaknesses and
threats
0 Pts
Missing OR
irrelevant to
the scenario
References 2 Pt
At least 3
references
provided using
appropriate style
and properly
cited in-text.
1 Pts
At most 2
appropriately
styled reference
are provided, or all
references are not
in an appropriate
style, or missing
in-text citations.
0 Pts
References
not provided
or not
appropriate
both in style
and in-text
citation.
Formatting,
style,
spelling,
and
grammar
3 Pt
Maximum of 1 or
2 minor issues.
2 Pts
Two of the three
are okay and
several issues with
the other.
1 Pts
Minor issues
with one,
several issues
with the other
two.
0 Pts
Major issues with
all.