academic and business skill

BIZ101/BIZ101A_Assessment #2A Page 1 of 6
Context:
Report writing is an important academic and business skill; and you will develop your ability to outline
the types of information, sections and layout included in professional reports. Researching credible
and reliable sources relates to the ability to develop new business ideas and concepts for creating
different perspectives on organizational change. For this task, you will not only present your ideas in a
report format but to evaluate a range of resources, both academic and non-academic for your chosen
topic.
Instructions:
Writing assessments 2A, 2B and 3 for this subject relate to the task of implementing a digital
communication strategy in an actual organization to solve a communication problem. Your chosen
organisation can relate to the discipline of your study, e.g. Event Management, Hospitality or Culinary
Management, Tourism Management, Business, Information Systems, Commerce, Marketing,
Entrepreneurship, Sports Management.
Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

ASSESSMENT 2A BRIEF
Subject Code and Title BIZ101 / BIZ101A: Business Communications
Assessment Report Outline and Source Analysis
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1000 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the task below include:
This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes:
a) Demonstrate academic skills appropriate to the level of study.
b) Demonstrate research skills and referencing appropriate to the
level of study.
d) Evaluate the use and importance of technology in presenting
business communication
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 3.2 (Week 6)
For Intensive (6 week) classes: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of
Module 3.2 (Week 3)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks

BIZ101/BIZ101A_Assessment #2A Page 2 of 6
Topics:
Choose one of the topics below for your assignments 2A, 2B and 3 to fix the organisation’s
communication issues:
A. Using Social Media in the workplace to communicate internally with staff
B. Boosting workplace motivation through innovative digital communication tools
C. Implementing instant messaging/group messaging, discussion forums and chatrooms in the
workplace
D. Podcasts, internal blogs/vlogs to communicate with employees or
E. Using an internal intranet/social Intranet for employee interaction.
Structure of assessment 2A:
Cover Page
– Includes the assessment title, your chosen topic, student name and ID, subject name and
code, lecturer’s name, submission date, word count. Be creative while making your cover page by
including an image and a citation with your image which needs to be added to the reference list, too.
TASK 1. Report Outline – 200 words (+/- 10%) for the whole outline.
The Report Outline is a plan of the report you will write for Assessment 2B. The report outline tells the
reader what to expect from the different sections of a report.
Introduction (outline only)
• Explain the purpose of an introduction.
• Provide context for the report you will write. It is expected that you write a brief introduction of the
business and background on the organizational issue/s relating to internal communication.
• State the purpose of the report you will write in assessment task 2B, e.g. include a purpose
statement such as “The report will . . . . and discuss…”.
• Outline the information you will include in the introduction of report 2B (don’t write it yet), your
chosen topic, and the intended audience (who will read the report? who is the information intended
for?)
Body – Source analysis (see the next page for Task 2)
Conclusion (outline only)
Explain the purpose of a conclusion and what questions will be answered in the conclusion of the
report but don’t provide the answers yet – that is for assessment task 2B.
Recommendations (outline only)
Explain the purpose of the recommendations section and what broad factors for implementation will
be included – broad ideas only, don’t write your recommendations, yet.
Remember that recommendations are based on conclusions, and conclusions are based on the
information in the body of the report.

BIZ101/BIZ101A_Assessment #2A Page 3 of 6
TASK 2. Source Analysis – 200 words per source analysis (+/- 10%) – body of the report.
The Source Analysis needs to include two academic and two non-academic sources that relate to
your chosen topic that will be useful for writing the Assessment 2B report.
The two academic sources can be articles from academic journals, published reliable reports or
academic books. The other two sources can come from reliable media sites, books, online magazines,
websites, YouTube videos, podcasts or TED Talks.
Apply the Five Tests of Reliability to each source as per your modules.
For each of your four sources, provide the following information separately:
1. The full name of the source – Include the full reference details as you would in the reference list
2. Type of source – E.g. website, journal article or video
3. A brief summary with an in-text citation for each source – Make sure to summarise from the
whole article/ text/ video or other source you have used. You will need to paraphrase to do so and
cite where relevant.
4. Evaluate the reliability of each source by applying the Five Reliability Tests using:
i. Authority
ii. Audience
iii. Transparency
iv. Objectivity
v. Currency
5. A justification about why the source is relevant to the chosen topic of your report.
Referencing
Provide one reference list for both tasks and include references of all four sources plus the image on
the cover page as a minimum using the TUA APA referencing style ensuring the list is in alphabetical
order.
References are not included in the word count. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for
citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here in the
Academic
Writing Guide
found via the Academic Skills website.
Submission Instructions
Submit your assessment via the Assessments link in the main navigation menu in BIZ101 / BIZ101A
Business Communications. Please submit all the tasks in one Word document including a reference list
on the final page.
Your learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in Blackboard. Feedback can be
viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately
referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to
have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and
subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are
viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

BIZ101/BIZ101A_Assessment 2A Page 4 of 6
Assessment Rubric

Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Number of sources
10%
Identifies less than 4
sources useful to
complete the
Assessment 2B Written
Report on the chosen
topic.
Identifies 4 sources,
however there are less
than 2 reliable academic
sources identified. The
usefulness and/or
suitability of the sources
identified to complete the
Assessment 2B Written
Report on the chosen topic
is debatable.
Identifies 4 sources, from
which at least 2 are from
reliable academic
sources.
The sources identified
are
generally useful and
appropriate to complete
the Assessment 2B
Written Report on the
chosen topic.
Identifies 4 sources,
from which at least 2 are
from reliable academic
sources.
All sources identified are
useful and pertinent to
complete the
Assessment 2B Written
Report on the chosen
topic.
Identifies 4 sources, from
which at least 2 are from
reliable academic
sources.
All sources identified are
highly pertinent to
complete the
Assessment
2B Written Report on
the chosen topic.
Referencing
20%
Does not include
correct
references or in-text
citations; does not use
APA style.
Attempts to include
references or in-text
citations; however, these
are sometimes insufficient
or incorrect; uses APA
style, however may
contain some
citation or
referencing errors.
Includes in-text citations
and references from
suitable sources; uses
APA style, however may
contain minor citation or
referencing errors.
Includes in-text citations
and references from
suitable sources; uses
APA style, containing
minimal and or no
errors.
Includes in-text citations
and references from
suitable sources; uses
APA
style, containing no
errors.

BIZ101/BIZ101A_Assessment 2A Page 5 of 6

Summary
25%
Sources have not been
summarised (i.e. more
than one summary
missing for one of the
sources).
There is no/ a limited
attempt at justifying
relevance of selected
sources.
Most sources have been
summarised (i.e. all
sources have partial
summaries or there is one
summary missing for one
of the sources).
The summaries are
inconsistently
appropriate to the task,
as demonstrated by an
interrupted flow of ideas
and at times lack of
clarity.
There is a basic attempt
at justifying the
relevance of all selected
sources, however this
needs substantial work
(i.e. relevance to topic
and task not entirely
clear or appropriate).
All sources have been
summarised
appropriately, however
this still needs some
work to achieve a clear
and coherent flow of
ideas.
There is a generally
adequate attempt at
justifying the relevance
of
all selected sources,
however, this still needs
some work (i.e.
relevance
to topic and task
inconsistently clear).
All sources have been
summarised
appropriately, coherently
and clearly.
All sources are justified in
relation to their
relevance to the topic of
the written report clearly
and
consistently.
All summaries are
consistently clear and
coherent; in the
summaries, the main
ideas are synthesised as
they are needed to
justify the source
selection in relation to
the topic of the written
report (i.e. main ideas
from sources are used to
justify selection and
relevance to chosen
topic).
Report format
20%
No headings,
subheadings,
and other report format
guidelines are not
followed.
Report format and
layout
not acceptable in the
business world.
Limited headings,
subheadings, and/or
some report format
guidelines
require adjustments.
Report format and layout
acceptable in the business
world with some
improvements required.
Headings and
subheadings
and other requirements
are consistent with
report format guidelines.
Report format and layout
acceptable in the
business world with
minor improvements
required.
Headings, subheadings
and other report format
guidelines are consistent.
Very good report
format. Layout
acceptable in the
business world with
little to no
improvements required.
Headings, subheadings
and other report format
guidelines are consistent.
Very professional work
provided with an
excellent
report format. Layout
acceptable in the
business
world.

BIZ101/BIZ101A_Assessment 2A Page 6 of 6

Reliability evaluation
25%
The reliability
evaluation
shows no
understanding of
source authority,
audience, transparency,
objectivity and
currency,
with omissions in all of
the tests.
The reliability evaluation
shows superficial
understanding of source
authority, audience,
transparency, objectivity
and currency, with
weaknesses in all of the
tests and some
omissions.
The reliability evaluation
shows a generally
competent
understanding of source
authority,
audience, transparency,
objectivity and currency,
with only weaknesses in
some of the tests and no
omissions.
The reliability evaluation
shows a clearly
competent
understanding of source
authority, audience,
transparency, objectivity
and currency, with no
more than one or two
weaknesses and no
omissions in all of the
tests.
The reliability
evaluation is
comprehensive,
thorough and
appropriate in all tests,
demonstrating a highly
competent
understanding of
source authority,
audience,
transparency,
objectivity and
currency, with no
weaknesses and no
omissions in all of the
tests.